Comparative Analysis
NES project is still in its initial phase since there are hardly any members "in their money". I think when people will see that others have steady every day's income and discover that NES is a kind of pension fund (just better) then probably more and more people will intend to join.
Earlier this week I was personally visited by a pension fund agent. She is selling special pension and insurance package of one of the biggest USA based insurance company (name from three letters starting with the first letter of ABC…- LOL). After the usual silly, long initial presentation finally she said that the most favourable program she can presently offer is to invest $1,200 every year for 20 years and the profit is ca. 5-6% yearly above the current inflation that is ca. 7-9 per annum gross and there is an insurance factor matched to their program. Program members there can first cashout after 10 years.
Comparing NES to that insurance program in figures, I think gives us more than a long verbal explanation:
| Insurance program |
| Total invested during 20 years $ | 24,000 |
|
| Total maturated $ | 476,651 |
|
| Rate (total maturated/invested) ca. | 20 |
|
| Never Ending Stori |
|
| NES 0.10/d | NES 0.05/d |
| Total invested | 100 | 100 |
| Daily accrual $ | 0.10 | 0.05 |
| Days needed to reach $100 per day | 1,000 | 2,000 |
| Sum earned during growing to 100 $ | 50,000 | 100,000 |
| Sum earned during 20 years $ | 630,000 | 530,000 |
| Total earned during 20 years $ | 680,000 | 630,000 |
| Rate (total earned/invested) | 6,800 | 6,300 |
The essence of the table: comparison of a high reputation insurance + investment program and NES, taking a 20 years long cycle time into consideration.
Assumptions and results: the insurance program needs $1,200 investments yearly, its return is 8% yearly. We can see that the total invested $24,000 grows up to $476,651 that is almost 20 times higher than the sum of initial investments. Nevertheless, this program gives an insurance for its members.
There are two columns for NES. In the first one we assumed that the daily accrual after breakeven (or in money) is $0.10 while the second contains figures assuming $0.05 daily accrual.
Starting the daily income from zero to reach $100 as daily income needs 1,000 days. During this period we will earn $50,000 – it’s a nice surprise, isn’t it? And we can start earning on the first day after in money…
20 years contain 7,300 days (approximately) we used 1,000 to reach $100 per day and if there is no accrual after that, we will earn $100 during 6,300 days. So totally we can earn $680,000 during the 20 years period that is 6,800 times higher than the initial investment of $100.
The second column gives a bit weaker return with $630,000 total income.
NES is typically a long term program which necessarily starts slow. It has many features causing to the slow start. We can take these factors into consideration and can suggest measurements to program administration and we can also take steps to improve the view of the program.
(1) Projected long time before the income really starts to inflow to your Pecunix (or other) account.
In the program description and other communication sources a 90 days terms come up several times. It is too long for a typical HYIP fan who is accustomed to the max. 30 days terms. The 90 days terms only mean that probably reach the break even and then there should be another long period till you will be in your money and you can really earn just after that. There is no any prediction for the time necessary to earn $100 or $500 a day.
I would like to remark here that Goldenrocks started its operation in the fourth quarter of 2004. They started dynamically grow in August - September 2005, that means 9-10 months after their start but Goldenrocks is a simple structured program (there were some changes in April 2005 or so but the structure was always simple)! It was just because people did not trust them so time and experience of others were needed to many people believe in it and they can imagine that they also can earn with that program.
NES probably need much longer time to reach success than Goldenrocks did because of the other reasons listed here.
(2) Complicated and not transparent rules, structure and functioning.
The program demonstrations, descriptions, analysis’ available from the “Editor” and from other sources (blogs, forums, etc.) cannot explain clearly how is the program functioning. Majority of people like clear, accountable rules and transparent structure. There is only a minority of people who prefers foggy, mystique structures and trusts blindly in the program administration.
(3) Low respect of Global Mutual.
There were sever changes in their other programs and there were late payments. Many people think of GM is a scam – well, fortunately they are wrong.
(4) Script glitches that were slowly repaired and badly communicated.
(5) Communication weaknesses.
There is a forum solely for NES but usually there is no answer to members questions or complaints.
Consequently, in this early phase of the program just the sophisticated and GM fan investors can imagine success with this program. I believe, with significant improvement in communication then more and more satisfied members as the program develops, it can be a very successful program of the coming years.
The trendline changed (calculated and plotted automatically by the spreadsheet software) in its nature. I pray for changing the trend to an increasing one in May.
